lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c
From
Date
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 21:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile
> > with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you.
>
> Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i
> checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)

I disagree with that being a relevant argument in the technical
discussion on the relative merits of two implementations of a given
facility. I also disagree with your numbers, if you talk about
deployement, I would be very very surprised if ARM wasn't close to
on-par with x86.

> In any case, i dont dispute that LMB is a bit cleaner than kernel/early_res.c
> - and both are much cleaner than the new e820 kernel/fw_memmap.c code posted
> here by Yinghai.
>
> If you dont disagree then please spare me the insults. (or move me into your
> killfile)

Well, I find some of your arguments quite insulting too, but let's move
on.

Cheers,
Ben.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-22 22:57    [W:0.123 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site