Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:13:12 +0200 | | From | Avi Kivity <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project |
| |
On 03/22/2010 06:08 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> On 03/22/2010 04:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >>> * Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 03/22/2010 02:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is why i consider that line of argument rather dishonest ... >>>>> >>>> I am not going to reply to any more email from you on this thread. >>>> >>> Because i pointed out that i consider a line of argument intellectually >>> dishonest? >>> >>> I did not say _you_ as a person are dishonest - doing that would be an ad >>> honimen attack against your person. (In fact i dont think you are, to the >>> contrary) >>> >>> An argument can certainly be labeled dishonest in a fair discussion and it >>> is not a personal attack against you to express my opinion about that. >>> >>> >> Sigh, why am I drawn into this. >> >> A person who uses dishonest arguments is a dishonest person. [...] >> > That's not how i understood that phrase - and i did not mean to suggest that > you are dishonest and i do not think that you are dishonest (to the contrary). >
Word games.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
|  |