lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project
On 03/22/2010 06:08 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 03/22/2010 04:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> * Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 03/22/2010 02:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is why i consider that line of argument rather dishonest ...
>>>>>
>>>> I am not going to reply to any more email from you on this thread.
>>>>
>>> Because i pointed out that i consider a line of argument intellectually
>>> dishonest?
>>>
>>> I did not say _you_ as a person are dishonest - doing that would be an ad
>>> honimen attack against your person. (In fact i dont think you are, to the
>>> contrary)
>>>
>>> An argument can certainly be labeled dishonest in a fair discussion and it
>>> is not a personal attack against you to express my opinion about that.
>>>
>>>
>> Sigh, why am I drawn into this.
>>
>> A person who uses dishonest arguments is a dishonest person. [...]
>>
> That's not how i understood that phrase - and i did not mean to suggest that
> you are dishonest and i do not think that you are dishonest (to the contrary).
>

Word games.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-22 17:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans