[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] afs: potential null dereference
    On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:05:20PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
    > Dan Carpenter <> wrote:
    > > It seems clear from the surrounding code that xpermits is allowed to be
    > > NULL here.
    > Interesting. The memcpy() won't oops due to this because if it is given a
    > NULL pointer, it will also be given a zero count. I wonder if this means the
    > if-statement your patch adds is actually unnecessary...

    I was concerned about the dereference here:

    + if (xpermits)
    + memcpy(permits->permits, xpermits->permits,
    + count * sizeof(struct afs_permit));

    This code has been there for three years, so yeah, you would think if it
    were a problem someone would have complained. My theory was "xpermits"
    was almost always non-null.

    dan carpenter

    > David

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-22 13:59    [W:0.019 / U:14.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site