[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git pull] drm request 2

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I disabled it in the merge, since I had to fix up that file anyway. But
> please don't make me do these so-called "evil merges" where I end up
> modifying the thing I merge.

Never mind. I've unpulled the whole effin' mess since it doesn't even

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c:191: error: redefinition of ‘nouveau_register_dsm_handler’
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h:859: note: previous definition of ‘nouveau_register_dsm_handler’ was here
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c:202: error: redefinition of ‘nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler’
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h:860: note: previous definition of ‘nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler’ was here

because not only was that VGA_SWITCHEROO Kconfig default the wrong way
around, the thing had clearly never ever been tested at all.

Why does sh*t like this even make it to me? Was this ever at all in -next?
I assume not, since that would have picked up on basic compile failures.

Grr. Things like this is what makes me go "Ok, there's always the next
merge window, maybe it will have gotten some testing by then".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-03 00:05    [W:0.066 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site