lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2
    On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:08:09 +0100 (CET)
    Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

    > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:57:22 +0200
    > > Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@nokia.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > >
    > > > Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
    > > > > First version of the hrtimer patch for oprofile. I did not add the
    > > > > sysctl yet, if the sysctl is added in oprofile_timer_init it would not
    > > > > be available if some better profiling source is available. If it is
    > > > > added unconditionally it would only have an effect if the timer
    > > > > fallback is used. Both cases are not exactly nice for a user space
    > > > > interface.
    > > >
    > > > I wonder what happened to this patch? Some platforms would need
    > > > this fix (i.e. the timer mode has to be used due to HW issues).
    > >
    > > After SH removed their oprofile hook there is nothing left that would
    > > prevent us from converting oprofile to hrtimer. Just a matter of
    > > reminding me and have me try again ;-)
    > >
    > > Patch against current git. Ingo, Thomas: one for the timer tree I guess.
    >
    > No objections from my side, but shouldn't that go via Robert ?

    Agreed, this should be handled by the oprofile maintainer.
    Robert, could you take care of the patch?

    --
    blue skies,
    Martin.

    "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-02 16:27    [W:0.022 / U:31.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site