lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 2 Mar 2010 13:20:59 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep warnings during early boot

* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> + if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> + return 1;
> + return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);

> + if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> + return 1;
> + return lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map);

i guess there could be a common helper here?

Also, could we clear rcu_scheduler_active when we clear debug_locks? That way
only a single test is needed, a generic 'is lock debugging active'.

(Which test should probably be unlikely() as well?)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-02 13:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2010