[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mmotm 0/5] memcg: per cgroup dirty limit (v7)
    On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:26:37 +0100
    Andrea Righi <> wrote:

    > Control the maximum amount of dirty pages a cgroup can have at any given time.
    > Per cgroup dirty limit is like fixing the max amount of dirty (hard to reclaim)
    > page cache used by any cgroup. So, in case of multiple cgroup writers, they
    > will not be able to consume more than their designated share of dirty pages and
    > will be forced to perform write-out if they cross that limit.
    > The overall design is the following:
    > - account dirty pages per cgroup
    > - limit the number of dirty pages via memory.dirty_ratio / memory.dirty_bytes
    > and memory.dirty_background_ratio / memory.dirty_background_bytes in
    > cgroupfs
    > - start to write-out (background or actively) when the cgroup limits are
    > exceeded
    > This feature is supposed to be strictly connected to any underlying IO
    > controller implementation, so we can stop increasing dirty pages in VM layer
    > and enforce a write-out before any cgroup will consume the global amount of
    > dirty pages defined by the /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio|dirty_bytes and
    > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio|dirty_background_bytes limits.
    > Changelog (v6 -> v7)
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > * introduce trylock_page_cgroup() to guarantee that lock_page_cgroup()
    > is never called under tree_lock (no strict accounting, but better overall
    > performance)
    > * do not account file cache statistics for the root cgroup (zero
    > overhead for the root cgroup)
    > * fix: evaluate cgroup free pages as at the minimum free pages of all
    > its parents
    > Results
    > ~~~~~~~
    > The testcase is a kernel build (2.6.33 x86_64_defconfig) on a Intel Core 2 @
    > 1.2GHz:
    > <before>
    > - root cgroup: 11m51.983s
    > - child cgroup: 11m56.596s
    > <after>
    > - root cgroup: 11m51.742s
    > - child cgroup: 12m5.016s
    > In the previous version of this patchset, using the "complex" locking scheme
    > with the _locked and _unlocked version of mem_cgroup_update_page_stat(), the
    > child cgroup required 11m57.896s and 12m9.920s with lock_page_cgroup()+irq_disabled.
    > With this version there's no overhead for the root cgroup (the small difference
    > is in error range). I expected to see less overhead for the child cgroup, I'll
    > do more testing and try to figure better what's happening.
    Okay, thanks. This seems good result. Optimization for children can be done under
    -mm tree, I think. (If no nack, this seems ready for test in -mm.)

    > In the while, it would be great if someone could perform some tests on a larger
    > system... unfortunately at the moment I don't have a big system available for
    > this kind of tests...
    I hope, too.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-15 03:43    [W:0.029 / U:22.640 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site