[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectWritable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1)
    On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:

    > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests
    > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and
    > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request.
    > >
    > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been
    > > over-looked, please point that out to me
    > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree:
    > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to
    > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge
    > window.

    Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any
    serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ...

    Any word on this?

    Jiri Kosina
    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-13 22:59    [W:0.022 / U:1.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site