[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectWritable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1)
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:

> > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests
> > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and
> > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request.
> >
> > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been
> > over-looked, please point that out to me
> Hi, yes, the writable limits tree:
> Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to
> decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge
> window.

Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any
serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ...

Any word on this?

Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-13 22:59    [W:0.088 / U:11.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site