Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:08:51 +0100 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Please pull UDF updates for 2.6.34-rc1 |
| |
On Tue 09-03-10 09:13:13, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:28:04 +0100 Jan Kara wrote: > > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests > > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and > > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request. > > It seems you haven't pulled my UDF tree (requested on Thursday - > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1003.0/02186.html). > > I've rebased the tree on top of 2.6.34-rc1 so could you please pull > > now? > > The full pull request for your convenience: > > > > could you please pull from > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-udf-2.6.git for_linus > > > > to get: > > > > Akinobu Mita (1): > > udf: use ext2_find_next_bit > > > > Jan Kara (2): > > udf: Fix unalloc space handling in udf_update_inode > > udf: Do not read inode before writing it > > > > The diffstat is > > > > fs/udf/balloc.c | 49 +------------------------------------------------ > > fs/udf/inode.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > I have no objections, fwiw, but please change the $subject line... OK, changing the subject line to catch attention.
Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR
| |