| Date | Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:52:13 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 09/35] x86: print out for RAM buffer |
| |
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:32:20 -0800 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> so could check that early in bootlog > > Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > index a966b75..dfb1689 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > @@ -1429,6 +1429,9 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void) > end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE; > if (start >= end) > continue; > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "reserve RAM buffer: %016Lx - %016Lx ", > + (unsigned long long) start, > + (unsigned long long) end); > reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end, > "RAM buffer"); > }
The typecasts for printing u64's are unneeded within x86 code. In fact I think they're now unneeded on all architectures.
|