Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:37:06 -0800 (PST) | From | Christian Kujau <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove EXPERIMENTAL from NFS_FSCACHE |
| |
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 at 10:53, Christian Kujau wrote: > there's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile > NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard > Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, > this won't happen. > > As Arjan van de Ven pointed out[1], the EXPERIMENTAL flag doesn't mean > that much any more, I propose the following patch to fs/nfs/Kconfig. I'd > do the same for fs/9p/Kconfig and fs/afs/Kconfig, but as I did not test 9p > or AFS, I feel it would not be appropriate for me to remove the flag.
....ping?
> > Please consider applying. > > Thanks, > Christian. > > [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5 > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/23/145 > > Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/Kconfig b/fs/nfs/Kconfig > index 59e5673..a43d07e 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/nfs/Kconfig > @@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ config ROOT_NFS > Most people say N here. > > config NFS_FSCACHE > - bool "Provide NFS client caching support (EXPERIMENTAL)" > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > + bool "Provide NFS client caching support" > depends on NFS_FS=m && FSCACHE || NFS_FS=y && FSCACHE=y > help > Say Y here if you want NFS data to be cached locally on disc through > > -- > BOFH excuse #259: > > Someone's tie is caught in the printer, and if anything else gets printed, he'll be in it too. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >
-- BOFH excuse #258:
That's easy to fix, but I can't be bothered.
| |