lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Patch 2/2] block: add sysfs lockdep class for iosched
On 02/08/2010 03:52 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Similar to the previous PM case, in iosched, we hold an s_active
> lock to store "scheduler", meanwhile we want to remove "iosched/*"
> files.
>
> This patch depends on the previous one. I tested it on my machine,
> it fixes the problem.
>
> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

After applying the 2 patches to 2.6.33-rc7, I get the following:

ACPI: bus type pci registered
PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-09] at [mem 0xe0000000-0xe09fffff] (base
0xe0000000)
PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0xe0000000-0xe09fffff] reserved in E820
PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.33-rc7-Linus-00010-g6339204-dirty #181
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8107c6e6>] __lock_acquire+0xf86/0x1d30
[<ffffffff81078e7f>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x5f/0x5d0
[<ffffffff8107d52b>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0x120
[<ffffffff81167a93>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x43/0x70
[<ffffffff81167243>] sysfs_deactivate+0xc3/0x110
[<ffffffff81167a93>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x43/0x70
[<ffffffff813124d3>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x243/0x300
[<ffffffff81167a93>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x43/0x70
[<ffffffff81167af6>] remove_dir+0x36/0x40
[<ffffffff81167b09>] sysfs_remove_subdir+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff81168ff6>] sysfs_remove_group+0x66/0xf0
[<ffffffff81861555>] param_sysfs_init+0x102/0x277
[<ffffffff8124a5bd>] ? sysdev_create_file+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff8130fe46>] ? register_cpu+0xa3/0xa5
[<ffffffff81861453>] ? param_sysfs_init+0x0/0x277
[<ffffffff810001d7>] do_one_initcall+0x37/0x190
[<ffffffff8184c6d0>] kernel_init+0x14f/0x1a5
[<ffffffff81003bd4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff8131417c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8184c581>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1a5
[<ffffffff81003bd0>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

This dump does not occur with standard 2.6.33-rc7. As the above turns off the
locking correctness validator, I cannot really test to see what happens when
suspending.

Larry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-08 21:53    [W:0.033 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site