[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
    On 02/23/2010 12:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
    >> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned
    >> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)?
    > Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in
    > and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently.
    > I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
    > on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available.

    Added to tip:x86/ptrace.


    H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-23 21:55    [W:0.020 / U:2.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site