[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
On 02/23/2010 12:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned
>> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)?
> Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in
> and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently.
> I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available.

Added to tip:x86/ptrace.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-23 21:55    [W:0.964 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site