lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 07:52:14PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:45:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > The solution? Stop this anti-real-world-usage bias already. Stop pretending
> > that those cross-build results are as important as say the thousands of real
> > bugzilla entries we have. They are fine info, but the kind of priority you are
> > giving them is causing a waste of resources.
>
> Ho-hum... "Kernel won't build for several thousand boxen"... "Five lines
> contain trailing whitespace"... Yup, the latter is far higher priority,
> all right.

IOW, I'd buy that argument from somebody who didn't protect checkpatch.pl
wankers against exactly that kind of criticism.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-23 21:01    [W:0.234 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site