lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] calgary: Increase the maximum PHB bus number
    On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:37:50AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
    > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:03:46AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
    > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:59:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
    > >
    > > > -#define MAX_NUM_OF_PHBS 8 /* how many PHBs in total? */
    > > > -#define MAX_NUM_CHASSIS 8 /* max number of chassis */
    > > > -/* MAX_PHB_BUS_NUM is the maximal possible dev->bus->number */
    > > > -#define MAX_PHB_BUS_NUM (MAX_NUM_OF_PHBS * MAX_NUM_CHASSIS * 2)
    > > > +/*
    > > > + The maximum PHB bus number.
    > > > + x3950M2 (rare): 8 chassis, 48 PHBs per chassis = 384
    > > > + x3950M2: 4 chassis, 48 PHBs per chassis = 192
    > > > + x3950 (PCIE): 8 chassis, 32 PHBs per chassis = 256
    > > > + x3950 (PCIX): 8 chassis, 16 PHBs per chassis = 128
    > > > +*/
    > > > +#define MAX_PHB_BUS_NUM 384
    > > > +
    > > > #define PHBS_PER_CALGARY 4
    > >
    > > We'll end up wasting a few bytes on small systems, but I don't think
    > > it's enough to matter on these fairly large systems. As far as I'm
    > > concerned, patch is fine.
    > >
    > > Acked-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
    >
    > Hmm... has this patch been queued up by anyone for the .34 merge
    > window?

    I don't maintain a separate Calgary patchset anymore, hopefully Ingo
    or one of the other x86 maintainers have picked it up?

    Cheers,
    Muli


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-20 08:21    [W:0.021 / U:29.856 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site