lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Firmware versioning best practices II
From
Date
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 10:35 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> That doesn't prevent some people from using foo-$APIVER-$CODEVER if
> they really have to, of course -- if they have firmware which can be
> conditionally compiled for both old and new APIs, for example. But I
> don't think it should be recommended.

That doesn't make much sense anyway. If the firmware filename is
foo-$APIVER-$CODEVER every code change would need a corresponding driver
change. If it is just foo-$APIVER then the $CODEVER can be embedded in
the firmware file and printed so you know which code you're using, but
if it doesn't influence the API I don't see why it should be part of the
filename?

johannes
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-20 12:03    [W:2.498 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site