[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] libata: pass host flags into __ata_pci_sff_init_one() helper
    On 02/18/2010 04:44 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
    > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:59:22 +0100
    > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<> wrote:
    >> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<>
    >> Subject: [PATCH] libata: pass host flags into __ata_pci_sff_init_one() helper
    >> This was orginally proposed by Alan Cox but as a change
    >> for ata_pci_sff_init_one() helper function instead of
    >> __ata_pci_sff_init_one() one which casues needless churn
    >> to all host drivers and accidentally breakes few host
    >> drivers which are still on their way upstream.
    >> Allows parallel scan and the like to be set without
    >> having to stop using the existing full helper functions.
    > NAK - __ is for internal symbol names.
    > I was split 50/50 on adding ata_pci_sff_init_one_flags() or similar but
    > the churn, given its a one off and we can then add all sorts of other
    > future flags without pain, seemed worth it.
    > I'm ambivalent about whether its best to go with a new function name as
    > you have or take the hit now (which seems sensible to me). Either way the
    > __ naming is wrong for an external interface.

    Your proposed patch from yesterday adding flags to each is fine.
    All-driver patches are just fine, as long as the need is demonstrated
    [and it is, in this case].

    > Anyway I'd *hope* we can get> 50% of interfaces parallel scanning at
    > which point it ceases to be more noise anyway !
    > Jeff ?

    Most hardware should support parallel scanning, sans caveats like
    chipsets that snoop SET FEATURES - XFER MODE (that command, and only
    that command, needs synchronization)


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-19 01:03    [W:0.021 / U:1.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site