Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:46:19 +0100 | From | Rudy Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: Linux mdadm superblock question. |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/15/2010 07:18 PM, david@lang.hm wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >>> On 02/15/2010 04:27 PM, Neil Brown wrote: >>> >>> There are three options: >>> >>> a) either don't boot from it (separate /boot); >>> b) use a bootloader which installs in the MBR and >>> hopefully-unpartitioned disk areas (e.g. Grub); >>> c) use a nonstandard custom MBR. >>> >>> Neither (b) or (c), of course, allow for chainloading from another OS >>> install and thus are bad for interoperability. >> >> I have had no problems with XFS partitions and lilo as the bootloader. >> I've been doing this for a couple of years now without realizing that >> there is supposed to be a problem. >> > > LILO also can be stuffed in the MBR (and then uses block-pointers from > there). There is one more option that I didn't mention, which is to > put the bootloader of a separate partition, OS/2 style. Again, breaks > the standard chainloading model. There is another configuration that fails. Use partitioned md. I do not think it matters whether over whole device or with a partition table. Neither grub nor lilo will boot off from it. I've tested that exensively with a partition on the disks. I am using PXE boot to boot 2 servers with that configuration. That adds a dependency on the pxe boot server, but considering the function of those servers they are moot if that pxe server is dead anyways....
Cheers,
Rudy
| |