Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:16:05 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sysfs: differentiate between locking links and non-links |
| |
Hello,
On 02/12/2010 10:20 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > My reasoning is that we effectively get an active reference on directories > for free because we have to delete the children before we can delete a > directory.
Yeah, as long as we guarantee that all children are removed before the parent, I think we're in the clear. The group handling seems problematic (w/ or w/o the patch) but yeap Ack on removing get_active_two.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |