lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: hv: General maintenance of TODO file
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:46:48PM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote:
> >> On a side note, when this becomes mainstream, could you give it a more
> >> descriptive name than just "hv"? "Hv" already means at least two
> >> possible things to me -- "hypervisor" or "high volume" -- neither of
> >> which appear to be what this code is about.
> >
> >"hyperv" should be sufficient, right?
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
>
> I was thinking of using that, but would that confuse it with hypervisor
> which is more of a general term? If the consensus is that it would not than
> I am in favor of changing it to hyperv.
>
> ms_hyperv would make it to long?

I don't believe "hyperv" is a generally-used abbreviation of
"hypervisor". You could do "ms_hyperv" if you like, but I wouldn't
regard the "ms_" prefix as essential.

Paul.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-12 01:15    [W:0.073 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site