lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (staging/dt3155)
    On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:44:30AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:47:47 -0800 Greg KH wrote:
    >
    > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:10:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    > > > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:04:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Hi all,
    > > > >
    > > > > I said:
    > > > > > News: there will be no linux-next releases until at least Dec 24 and,
    > > > > > more likely, Dec 29. Have a Merry Christmas and take a break. :-)
    > > > >
    > > > > Well, I decided I had time for one more so it will be based in -rc1).
    > > > >
    > > > > This one has not had the build testing *between* merges, but has had all
    > > > > the normal build testing at the end. Since the latter testing showed no
    > > > > problems, this just means that there may be more unbisectable points in
    > > > > the tree (but that is unlikely).
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > When CONFIG_DT3155=y (i.e., not a loadable module):
    > >
    > > Ick, I'll change that to 'M' now, it shouldn't be built in just yet for
    > > the reasons you found.
    > >
    > > I don't think the code has ever been built as 'y' as you just found out.
    >
    > Greg,
    > Did you get around to making any of these changes?

    I have started working on them, but have not gotten to all of them yet.

    thanks for your patience,

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-11 17:57    [W:0.021 / U:29.528 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site