Messages in this thread | | On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:12 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:56 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > >> member rt_se of struct rt_rq is a duplicate of tg->rt_se[cpu]. > >> So we can remove one of them. After checking CFS, I think > >> rt_rq->rt_se can be removed for some kinds of consistence. > > > > Looks good I think. > > Hi Peter, > > Seems nobody has objection on the two patches. > Can you pick them up?
I'll take them, thanks!
| |