Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [stable] [patch 2/3] nohz: fix printk_needs_cpu() return value on offline cpus | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:13:30 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:07 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:32:41PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:00 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > plain text document attachment (002_printk_needs_cpu.diff) > > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > > > > > > > > This patch fixes a hang observed with 2.6.32 kernels where timers got > > > > enqueued on offline cpus. > [...] > > > > Is this going to make it into .37, or is it going to wait until .38? > > I hope it will go into .37. The same should be true for the > get_next_timer_interrupt() which addresses the same problem. > Peter, Ingo?
Ingo just send the pull request to Linus for two of the three patches, I'll try and feed him the last one today.
| |