lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[125/289] net: NETIF_F_HW_CSUM does not imply FCoE CRC offload
2.6.36-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>

commit 66c68bcc489fadd4f5e8839e966e3a366e50d1d5 upstream.

NETIF_F_HW_CSUM indicates the ability to update an TCP/IP-style 16-bit
checksum with the checksum of an arbitrary part of the packet data,
whereas the FCoE CRC is something entirely different.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
net/core/dev.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1648,10 +1648,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_attach);

static bool can_checksum_protocol(unsigned long features, __be16 protocol)
{
- return ((features & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM) ||
- ((features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM) &&
+ return ((features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM) ||
+ ((features & NETIF_F_V4_CSUM) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) ||
- ((features & NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM) &&
+ ((features & NETIF_F_V6_CSUM) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) ||
((features & NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_FCOE)));



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-08 02:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans