[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?
    On Sun, Dec 05 2010 at  3:28pm -0500,
    Andi Kleen <> wrote:

    > > As another thought, what version of GCC are people using who are having difficulty? Could this perhaps be a compiler-related issue?
    > A compiler problem seems very unlikely here.
    > What may be an useful experiment would be to test 2.6.37-rc + ext4 over
    > device mapper, but not dmcrypt. If that fails too then it's likely
    > some generic device mapper problem.

    That would only prove its not dm-crypt; it would not absolve a non-DM
    2.6.37-rc change at all.

    Leveraging the fact that 2.6.36 + parallel dm-crypt is reportedly very
    solid: maybe these would be more interesting (each would keep the latest
    parallel dm-crypt patch overlayed for all tests):

    1) Test 2.6.37-rc prior to all flush+fua changes (only changes DM saw
    for 2.6.37-rc so far).

    2) Back out all ext4 changes that were merged for 2.6.37-rc
    - though Heinz is using XFS exclussively and still reported

    3) A full git bisect of good=v2.6.36 bad=v2.6.37-rc4 would be the most
    interesting. Albeit much more tedious.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-05 22:17    [W:0.020 / U:10.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site