Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:29:33 +0100 | | From | Tejun Heo <> | | Subject | Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt |
| |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:56:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/18/2010 07:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the > >> address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> > > > > For this and the other x86 patch. > > > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > > > > I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through > > the x86 tree, right? > > > > Yes, as long as I can get a stable base to pull into -tip.
I suppose I should take the two x86 and the gameport patches here into percpu tree with your ACKs too. Would that be okay with you?
Thanks.
-- tejun
|  |