[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory
On 12/29/2010 05:07 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> That's from f51bf3073a1 (x86, numa: Fake apicid and pxm mappings for NUMA
>>> emulation) and c1c3443c9c (x86, numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA
>>> emulation) in x86/numa. Given the subject line, I think your patchset is
>>> targeted to the same branch so I'm not sure what's concerning?
>> No, it's part of a much bigger patchset which doesn't have anything to
>> do with NUMA. That's the problem.
>> In other words, I need a sane way to merge them and resolve the conflict.
> The two patches above from x86/numa that create the conflict should be
> dependent only on 4e76f4e67a (x86, numa: Avoid compiling NUMA emulation
> functions without CONFIG_NUMA_EMU), so cherry-pick them into x86/bootmem?

That would hurt more, I think.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-30 02:57    [W:0.072 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site