[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory
    On 12/29/2010 05:07 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
    > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >>> That's from f51bf3073a1 (x86, numa: Fake apicid and pxm mappings for NUMA
    >>> emulation) and c1c3443c9c (x86, numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA
    >>> emulation) in x86/numa. Given the subject line, I think your patchset is
    >>> targeted to the same branch so I'm not sure what's concerning?
    >> No, it's part of a much bigger patchset which doesn't have anything to
    >> do with NUMA. That's the problem.
    >> In other words, I need a sane way to merge them and resolve the conflict.
    > The two patches above from x86/numa that create the conflict should be
    > dependent only on 4e76f4e67a (x86, numa: Avoid compiling NUMA emulation
    > functions without CONFIG_NUMA_EMU), so cherry-pick them into x86/bootmem?

    That would hurt more, I think.


    H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-30 02:57    [W:0.030 / U:5.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site