lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target)
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 14:49 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
    > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 11:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi all,
    > > >
    > > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly]
    > > >
    > > > Changes since 20101221:
    > > >
    > > > Linus' tree lost its build failure.
    > >
    > >
    > > Hi Nick,
    > >
    > > Please test building target code when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled.
    > >
    > > When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, drivers/target/ gets a boat load of build errors.
    > >
    > > Should TCM_IBLOCK depend on BLOCK? That fixes lots of the build errors,
    > > but not all of them.
    > >
    > >
    > > The header file include/target/target_core_base.h uses struct queue_limits,
    > > so it should #include <linux/blkdev.h>.
    > >
    > >
    >
    > Added the missing include here:
    >
    > target: Add linux/blkdev.h include in target_core_base.h
    > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=e8bd07d3a525e71b424d308fc5084b89a6456bb2
    >
    > Thanks Randy!

    Could you just do mod patches inline to the list, please? It's much
    less convenient trying to pull them out of a web page.

    Thanks,

    James




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-28 16:13    [W:0.036 / U:30.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site