Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:28:27 +0900 | From | Kukjin Kim <> | Subject | RE: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the s5p tree |
| |
Takashi Iwai wrote: >
(snip)
> > > > Anyway I need above commits from sound-2.6.git in my tree... > > > > so how method is better to me instead of cherry-pick it? > > > > > > You can merge topic/asoc branch of sound git tree. > > > This brach contains the all necessary commits for ASoC and is almost > > > never rebased. > > > > Hi, > > > > But I can't merge it because there is no 'topic/asoc' branch in > > sound-2.6.git. > > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git) > > > > Is there another repository? > > OK, Mark's tree doesn't contain. But you can merge for-2.6.38 tree there. > > The main sound git tree is found in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git > Aha~ :-)
> > And should I merge it in my tree even though don't need all of ASoC commits > > :-( ? > > In general yes because this is the tree to be merged to 2.6.38. > Yeah, I know it.
> > I'm not sure how many commits are in there... > > You can keep two branches. One contains only your fixes, and another > is the merged branch from yours and from sound git tree. Expose the > latter merged tree for linux-next. > Yeah...however, firstly, my tree will be sent to rmk during 38 merge window, if I merge from sound git, for avoiding build error I should send all including them not only my patches. I think there is no need to rmk...hmm
So I did 'cherry-pick' only needed 2 commits in my tree.
> There are many other ways to manage such things, but the above has > worked for me well, at least.
Yeah I think so...but is there another better way in this case? Hehehe...
Anyway Merry Xmas ;-) Thanks.
Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
| |