Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:22:48 -0800 | From | Darren Hart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4 V3 ] futex,plist: pass the real head of the priority list to plist_del() |
| |
On 12/22/2010 01:02 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 12/22/2010 02:50 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 12/21/2010 10:18 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>> On 12/22/2010 03:13 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>> On 12/21/2010 01:55 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Lai, >>>> >>>> Looks about ready to me, only a couple of more nitpics from me. >>>> >>> >>> Fixed, thanks. >> >> Looks good to me. How did the futextest runs go? >> > > It's OK, the result are almost the same. > > kernel version: 2.6.37-rc6-tip > Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz > MemTotal: 961208 kB >
This is futex_wait.c I presume? Delta looks to be in the realm of statistical noise to me. I'll ack the two patches.
-- Darren
> # diff result result.applied -u | grep '^[+-]' > --- result 2010-12-22 16:57:45.000000000 +0800 > +++ result.applied 2010-12-22 16:56:39.000000000 +0800 > -Result: 12048 Kiter/s > +Result: 12210 Kiter/s > -Result: 4037 Kiter/s > +Result: 3554 Kiter/s > -Result: 3331 Kiter/s > +Result: 3347 Kiter/s > -Result: 2996 Kiter/s > +Result: 3124 Kiter/s > -Result: 2998 Kiter/s > +Result: 3087 Kiter/s > -Result: 2894 Kiter/s > +Result: 3008 Kiter/s > -Result: 2863 Kiter/s > +Result: 2882 Kiter/s > -Result: 3098 Kiter/s > +Result: 3265 Kiter/s > -Result: 2888 Kiter/s > +Result: 2811 Kiter/s > -Result: 2876 Kiter/s > +Result: 2995 Kiter/s > -Result: 2893 Kiter/s > +Result: 2980 Kiter/s > -Result: 3100 Kiter/s > +Result: 2860 Kiter/s > -Result: 2915 Kiter/s > +Result: 2964 Kiter/s > -Result: 2940 Kiter/s > +Result: 3035 Kiter/s > -Result: 2671 Kiter/s > +Result: 2939 Kiter/s
-- Darren Hart Yocto Linux Kernel
| |