lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
    On 2010-12-21 23:54 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:23 Nick Bowler wrote:
    > > On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
    > > > for BKL itself.
    > > >
    > > > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
    > > > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.
    > >
    > > UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.
    >
    > Would you mind running a kernel with this patch and lockdep enabled then?

    I will definitely try it, but I probably won't get around to it before
    the new year.

    Thanks,

    --
    Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-22 16:25    [W:0.020 / U:62.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site