lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
On 2010-12-21 23:54 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:23 Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
> > > for BKL itself.
> > >
> > > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
> > > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.
> >
> > UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.
>
> Would you mind running a kernel with this patch and lockdep enabled then?

I will definitely try it, but I probably won't get around to it before
the new year.

Thanks,

--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-22 16:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site