lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [concept & "good taste" review] persistent store
From
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> Yes, this was exactly what I was trying to say! Do something in a
> watchdog handler path that shows that we actually made progress. But
> you're right, we'd still need the notification. My look at "did we make
> a progress" was too simple and there _are_ nuances which need to be
> accounted for.

My view of the notification is:
1) Oops happens, gets written to persistent store.
2) fs/pstore code makes a file appear in /dev/pstore
3) Daemon that's watching /dev/pstore sees new file
4) File is read, copied some place safe and fsync'd
5) Daemon unlinks file from /dev/pstore
6) fs/pstore code tells platform level to erase record

-Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-20 22:11    [W:0.067 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site