Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 15/15] nohz_task: Procfs interface | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:16:39 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 16:57 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Should I?
Well yes, this interface of explicitly marking a task and cpu as task_no_hz is kinda restrictive and useless.
When I run 4 cpu-bound tasks on a quad-core I shouldn't have to do anything to benefit from this.
I don't see why having this cpumask is restricting you in any way, user-space tasks don't migrate around, that all happens in kernel space.
Also, I'm not quite happy with the pure userspace restriction, but at least I see why you did that event though you didn't mention that.
| |