lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] jump label: make enable/disable o(1)
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:33:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:23 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> >
> > For the jump label disabled case, perf is using atomic_inc/dec and atomic_read
> > to check if enabled. While other consumers (tracepoints) are just using an
> > 'int'. I didn't want hurt the jump label disabled case for tracepoints.
> > If we can agree to use atomic ops for tracepoints, or drop atomics from
> > perf, that would simplify things.
>
> I had a quick look at the tracepoint stuff but got lost, but surely it
> has a reference count somewhere as well, it needs to know when the last
> probe goes away.. or does it check if the list is empty?
>
> Anyway, tracepoint enable/disable isn't a real fast-path, surely it
> could suffer an atomic op?

It is the atomic_read() at the tracepoint site that I am concerned
about.

thanks,

-Jason


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-16 20:39    [W:0.060 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site