lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] Alternative approach to MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE
    On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:26:59AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
    > >> Ping has touched upon this subject as well, from the pen & touch perspective.
    > >> Generally, some ABS axes are actually enumerations, for which we have no
    > >> direct abstraction. If we had a way to declare the used values for such
    > >> enumerations, it would resolve these and possibly other issues.
    >
    > > I think that presence of pen/touch can be detected by having
    > > BTN_TOOL_PEN and BTN_TOOL_FINGER. However in this case the tool is
    > > finger, so I do not think we should introduce BTN_TOOL_ENVELOPE. Maybe
    > > this is another case where we should employ the proposed device flags?
    >
    > Yes. Having something like INPUT_QUIRK_SEMI_MT might be enough, and we could
    > drop the whole MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE circus. Chase, Peter, Chris, would you be
    > comfortable with such a solution?

    sounds good to me, thanks.

    Cheers,
    Peter

    > > Anyway, it looks like we have a few concerns with current
    > > MT_TOOL_ENVELOPE so I want to rewind my 'next' branch.
    >
    > Yep. Should I also take the opportunity to sync from -rc1 instead, and fold the
    > cleanup patches into the appropriate places?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Henrik
    >


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-16 01:23    [W:0.020 / U:268.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site