Messages in this thread | | | From | Paolo Ciarrocchi <> | Date | Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:13:28 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after slot swap |
| |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote: > I don't have an objection to the patch, rather to the methodology where > stable kernels are more or less totally untested. I would like at least the > kvm part to see some testing before it sees users. The process we worked > out with Greg is: > > - Greg rejects kvm patches (but not virtio etc) pointing submitters to the > kvm maintainers > - The kvm maintainers collect stable kvm patches and autotest them > - They then submit the patches to stable@ > > The process is slower than the standard stable process but results in > something that is less likely to fail.
But all the patches tagged for -stable are supposed to be already upstream and therefore well tested. What am I missing?
Regards, -- Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |