Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:32:31 +0600 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog) | From | Rakib Mullick <> |
| |
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> > > NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want > touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if > CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y. > I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?
thanks, rakib
| |