Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true | | From | Steven Rostedt <> | | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:12:17 -0500 |
| |
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 01:09 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 12/11/2010 01:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > >> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are > >> busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course > >> switching in and out of idle state all the time. > >> > >> How about just dropping likely/unlikely? > > > > OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by? > > Sure, then, I'll route it through my tree.
OK, I'll post a new patch series again. Just pluck it from that, and let me know so I can remove it from my tree.
Thanks,
-- Steve
|  |