Messages in this thread | | | From | Jeff Moyer <> | Subject | Re: [patch]block cfq: select new workload if priority changed | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:56:14 -0500 |
| |
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> writes:
> If priority is changed, continue checking workload_expires and service tree > count of previous workload is meaningless. We should always choose the workload
I'd change that first sentence to:
If priority is changed, continuing to check workload_expires and service tree count of the previous workload does not make sense.
> with lowest key of new priority in such case. > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
This makes sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
| |