lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch]block cfq: select new workload if priority changed
Date
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> writes:

> If priority is changed, continue checking workload_expires and service tree
> count of previous workload is meaningless. We should always choose the workload

I'd change that first sentence to:

If priority is changed, continuing to check workload_expires and
service tree count of the previous workload does not make sense.

> with lowest key of new priority in such case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

This makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-10 15:59    [W:0.059 / U:2.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site