lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:58 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:49:49PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:46 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:38:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:23 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > > > > > What does kexec normally do to ensure hardware is left in a sane state?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Typically calls device_shutdown() and sysdev_shutdown() from
>> > > > > kernel_restart_prepare() to shutdown the devices.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Also calls machine_shutdown() which depending on architecture can take
>> > > > > care of various things like stopping other cpus, shutting down LAPIC,
>> > > > > disabling IOAPIC, disabling hpet, shutting down IOMMU etc
>> > > > > (native_machine_shutdown()).
>> > > >
>> > > > So basically there's no sane generic reset callout?
>> > >
>> > > I think ->shutdown() calls are sane generic callouts. Isn't it?
>> >
>> > ->shutdown looks like it's about to reset/halt the hardware, no point in
>> > slowing down the regular shutdown/reboot path for something like this,
>> > we know the hardware will get reset to a sane state.
>>
>> I think we already call ->shutdown() in regular reboot path.
>>
>> kernel_restart()
>> kernel_restart_prepare()
>> device_shutdown();
>> sysdev_shutdown();
>>
>> So it should not make lot of difference if perf subsystem/counters are
>> also shutdown using ->shutdown().
>
> Oh, but I'm not a device or sysdev thing, I'll never get something like
> that.

There is also the reboot notifier, if the NMI needs to be controlled
outside of device model. Sigh. The NMI handling is such a special case.

>> > > There seem to be few exceptions for LAPIC, IOMMU and HPET and I am not
>> > > sure why they are not covered by shutdown calls. CCing Eric, he might
>> > > have more insight into it.
>> >
>> > That's all arch specific, but even there I don't think the reset code
>> > should live outside of kexec.
>>
>> I would not know the history but I have heard stories that if you don't
>> shutdown the hardware over restart, BIOS might not be expecting it and
>> might get trumped.
>
> Never yet had a problem with that.

I haven't personally but I have certainly heard stories and seen
debugging sessions where some devices work or don't depending on the
order of running linux and windows on a machine, with soft reboots in
between.

Eric



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-01 22:51    [W:1.046 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site