lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable"
Date
> > Yes, I've tested it, and it deprecates the tunable as expected.  A single 
> > warning message serves the purpose well: let users know one time without
> > being overly verbose that the tunable is deprecated and give them
> > sufficient time (2 years) to start using the new tunable. That's how
> > deprecation is done.
>
> no sense.
>
> Why do their application need to rewrite for *YOU*? Okey, you will got
> benefit from your new knob. But NOBDOY use the new one. and People need
> to rewrite their application even though no benefit.
>
> Don't do selfish userland breakage!

And you said you ignore bug even though you have seen it. It suck!





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-09 04:31    [W:0.463 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site