Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:16:06 +0200 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: task blocked for more than 120 seconds |
| |
On (11/04/10 18:32), Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:19 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 05:58:26PM +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Got the following traces: > > > > > > [42001.449295] INFO: task openbox:17761 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > > > [42001.449303] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. > > > [42001.449311] openbox D 0000000000000003 0 17761 3723 0x00000000 > > > [42001.449321] ffff88004ce8dc38 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff88004ce8c000 > > > [42001.449333] ffff88004ce8dfd8 0000000000012040 ffff880133010000 ffff88004ce8dfd8 > > > [42001.449343] 0000000000012040 0000000000012040 ffff88004ce8dfd8 0000000000012040 > > > [42001.449354] Call Trace: > > > [42001.449369] [<ffffffff814212ff>] schedule_timeout+0x38/0x220 > > > [42001.449381] [<ffffffff81066f21>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72 > > > [42001.449389] [<ffffffff81423dae>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x59 > > > [42001.449398] [<ffffffff81036070>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x41 > > > [42001.449406] [<ffffffff81036132>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x92/0xa5 > > > [42001.449413] [<ffffffff8142057e>] wait_for_common+0xca/0x144 > > > [42001.449421] [<ffffffff81038b13>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xf > > > [42001.449429] [<ffffffff81423e4b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6f/0x74 > > > [42001.449436] [<ffffffff81420692>] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x1a > > > [42001.449445] [<ffffffff81084808>] stop_one_cpu+0x8c/0xba > > > > These traces look related to: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1055100 > > > > Does reverting 34f971f6f7988be4d014eec3e3526bee6d007ffa help in your > > case? > >
Hello, I'll test "sched: Fixup cross sched_class wakeup preemption" first and then (if it fails) I'll test 34f971f6f7988be4d014eec3e3526bee6d007ffa revert.
Sergey
> --- > Subject: sched: Fixup cross sched_class wakeup preemption > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > Date: Sun Oct 31 12:37:04 CET 2010 > > Instead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr() > implementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption > path. > > This fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the > stop machine thread to run.. > > Tested-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > LKML-Reference: <new-submission> > --- > kernel/sched.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > kernel/sched_fair.c | 6 ------ > kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c > @@ -560,18 +560,9 @@ struct rq { > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues); > > -static inline > -void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > -{ > - rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags); > > - /* > - * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In > - * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update. > - */ > - if (test_tsk_need_resched(p)) > - rq->skip_clock_update = 1; > -} > +static inline > +void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags); > > static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq) > { > @@ -9400,4 +9391,30 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited); > > +static inline > +void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > +{ > + const struct sched_class *class; > + > + if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class) > + rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags); > + > + for_each_class(class) { > + if (class == rq->curr->sched_class) > + break; > + if (class == p->sched_class) { > + resched_task(rq->curr); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + /* > + * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In > + * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update. > + */ > + if (test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)) > + rq->skip_clock_update = 1; > +} > + > + > #endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */ > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c > @@ -1654,12 +1654,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr); > int scale = cfs_rq->nr_running >= sched_nr_latency; > > - if (unlikely(rt_prio(p->prio))) > - goto preempt; > - > - if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)) > - return; > - > if (unlikely(se == pse)) > return; > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select_task_rq_stop(struct rq *rq, struc > static void > check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > { > - resched_task(rq->curr); /* we preempt everything */ > + /* we're never preempted */ > } > > static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq) > [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |