[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/10] MCDE: Add build files and bus
    On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
    > 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann <>:
    > > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
    > > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
    > > declared as "static struct" and registered using
    > > platform_device_register (or other bus specific functions). This
    > > is no longer valid and we are removing the existing users, do not
    > > add new ones. When creating a platform device, use
    > > platform_device_register_simple or platform_device_register_resndata.
    > Is this part of the generic ARM runtime multi-platform kernel
    > and device trees shebang?
    > The Ux500 still isn't in that sector, it needs extensive rewriting
    > of arch/arm/mach-ux500 to be done first, so as to support e.g.
    > U8500 and U5500 with a single kernel image.
    > Trying to skin that cat that as part of this review is a bit too
    > much to ask IMO, I'd rather have the author of this driver
    > adapt to whatever platform data registration mechanism is
    > in place for the merge window. Else it needs fixing as part
    > of a bigger endavour to root out compile-time platform
    > configuration.

    The 'no static devices' rule is something that Greg brought up
    at the embedded developer session during PlumbersConf this year,
    I wasn't aware of the problem before that either.

    It is not related to the multi-platform kernel work and it's
    not ARM specific.

    Maybe Greg can give a short explanation of the impact of this.
    AFAIR, static device definitions still work, but there are
    plans to remove that capability in the future.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-30 16:25    [W:0.020 / U:37.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site