lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote:

> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection.
>

Would you like to elaborate as to why?

> Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 4029583..30b24b9 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
> * implementation used by LSMs.
> */
> - if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
> + has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> points -= 30;
>
> /*


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-04 00:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans