lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check"
    From
    Hi Jan,

    On 26 November 2010 13:18, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
    > ... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option,
    > which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on
    > !X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary
    > anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since
    > these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be
    > conditional?
    >
    > Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC
    > off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?

    Yeah, having reached this point we think OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE should be
    merged into CONFIG_OLPC. I'll submit a patch soon.

    Daniel


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-26 21:37    [W:0.033 / U:60.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site