lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check"
From
Hi Jan,

On 26 November 2010 13:18, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> ... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option,
> which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on
> !X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary
> anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since
> these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be
> conditional?
>
> Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC
> off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?

Yeah, having reached this point we think OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE should be
merged into CONFIG_OLPC. I'll submit a patch soon.

Daniel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-26 21:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site