Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: trivial: make comment about vs{n,cn,}printf more understandable | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:20:57 -0500 |
| |
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 21:04 -0600, Milton Miller wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 at about 16:12:45 -0000, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > "You probably want ... instead." sounds like a recommendation better > > not to use the v... functions. > > > > Which is true, if you dont' have a va_list its hard to get them. > But I do get your point. > > > * the @buf not including the trailing '\0'. If @size is <= 0 the function > > * returns 0. > > * > > - * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list. > > - * You probably want scnprintf() instead. > > + * If you're not already dealing with a va_list better use scnprintf(). > > That doesn't flow off my (mid-western usa) tounge. > > How about > * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list. > * Otherwise you probably want to use scnprintf().
This is closer to what he asked us on IRC ;-)
But a "do X if Y" is more perl syntax than English (IMHO).
> > Alternatively, > * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider scnprintf().
This isn't bad. My recommendation I gave him was:
* If you are already dealing with a va_list, then call this function. * Otherwise you probably want to use scnprintf()
But my upstate NY tongue may not be the best judgment here.
-- Steve
"When people ask me what language my mother tongue is, I simply reply 'C'"
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |