lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub
    On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

    > Ah! I knew I was missing something: the second cmpxchg will fail because it
    > expects "tid", but the value is now the "next_tid". So effectively, many
    > instances of the same transaction can run concurrently, but only one will
    > succeed.

    Right.

    > Sorry for the noise.

    No its good to hear that you were not able to find a hole on first glance.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-24 04:13    [W:0.021 / U:0.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site