Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Franck Bui-Huu <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/3] perf: don't bother to init the hrtimer for no SW sampling counters | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:21:45 +0100 |
| |
From: Franck Bui-Huu <fbuihuu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Franck Bui-Huu <fbuihuu@gmail.com> --- kernel/perf_event.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c index 813b09e..31515200 100644 --- a/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -4894,24 +4894,26 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart perf_swevent_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *hrtimer) static void perf_swevent_start_hrtimer(struct perf_event *event) { struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; + s64 period; + + if (!is_sampling_event(event)) + return; hrtimer_init(&hwc->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL); hwc->hrtimer.function = perf_swevent_hrtimer; - if (is_sampling_event(event)) { - s64 period = local64_read(&hwc->period_left); - if (period) { - if (period < 0) - period = 10000; + period = local64_read(&hwc->period_left); + if (period) { + if (period < 0) + period = 10000; - local64_set(&hwc->period_left, 0); - } else { - period = max_t(u64, 10000, hwc->sample_period); - } - __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&hwc->hrtimer, + local64_set(&hwc->period_left, 0); + } else { + period = max_t(u64, 10000, hwc->sample_period); + } + __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&hwc->hrtimer, ns_to_ktime(period), 0, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED, 0); - } } static void perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer(struct perf_event *event) -- 1.7.3.2
| |