[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
    On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
    > for BKL itself.
    > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
    > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.

    UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.

    Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-22 16:21    [W:0.022 / U:38.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site