Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:37:08 +0100 (CET) | From | Jesper Juhl <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups |
| |
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 20:33 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:41 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > So the set of all tasks that never call proc_set_tty() ends up in the same one > > > > big default group, correct? > > > > > > Well, yes and no. > > > > > > Yes, that's what the code currently does. But I did ask Mike (and he > > > delivered) to try to make the code look and work in a way where the > > > whole "tty thing" is just one of the heuristics. > > > > > > It's not clear exactly what the non-tty heuristics would be, but I do > > > have a few suggestions: > > > > > > - I think it might be a good idea to associate a task group with the > > > current "cred" of a process, and fall back on it in the absense of a > > > tty-provided one. > > > > > Or how about (just brainstorming here) a group per 'process group'? > > I switched to per session, which on my system at least looks like more > than enough granularity. > Sounds sane and it's closer to the original 'per tty' which was so successful.
-- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.
| |